Abstract
After independence, Sudan’s political elite adopted colonial-inspired policies that sought to divide the country into North and South (Arabs versus Africans). This policy was further reinforced by the civil wars and by the failures of the Sudanese political elite to construct a cohesive national identity. In the post-independence period, one elite group aligned itself with an Arab identity, while another embraced an African identity. Logically, therefore, both identities—Islamic-Arab and African—encompass the majority of the population. Yet, while Islamists and Africanists each claimed to represent this majority, neither addressed the contradictions inherent in their positions. As the tension between the Islamic-Arab and African projects illustrates, there is no permanent Sudanese majority that can be established. Rather, Sudanese people possess multiple and overlapping affiliations—religious, linguistic, and regional—that together produce shifting cross-cutting majorities.
Recommended Citation
Galaleldeen, Abdalla
(2025)
"The Sudanese Identity in the Mirror of Colonial and Post-Independence History,"
The Journal of Social Encounters:
Vol. 9:
Iss.
2, 268-280.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69755/2995-2212.1377
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/social_encounters/vol9/iss2/19
DOWNLOADS
Since September 21, 2025
Included in
African Languages and Societies Commons,
African Studies Commons,
Anthropology Commons,
Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons,
Inequality and Stratification Commons,
International Relations Commons,
Islamic Studies Commons,
Peace and Conflict Studies Commons,
Politics and Social Change Commons,
Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons
COinS
Home > Journals > The Journal of Social Encounters > Vol. 9 (2025) > Iss. 2
The Sudanese Identity in the Mirror of Colonial and Post-Independence History
Authors
Abdalla Galaleldeen, Omdurman Islamic UniversityFollow
Abstract
After independence, Sudan’s political elite adopted colonial-inspired policies that sought to divide the country into North and South (Arabs versus Africans). This policy was further reinforced by the civil wars and by the failures of the Sudanese political elite to construct a cohesive national identity. In the post-independence period, one elite group aligned itself with an Arab identity, while another embraced an African identity. Logically, therefore, both identities—Islamic-Arab and African—encompass the majority of the population. Yet, while Islamists and Africanists each claimed to represent this majority, neither addressed the contradictions inherent in their positions. As the tension between the Islamic-Arab and African projects illustrates, there is no permanent Sudanese majority that can be established. Rather, Sudanese people possess multiple and overlapping affiliations—religious, linguistic, and regional—that together produce shifting cross-cutting majorities.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
Galaleldeen, Abdalla (2025) "The Sudanese Identity in the Mirror of Colonial and Post-Independence History," The Journal of Social Encounters: Vol. 9: Iss. 2, 268-280.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.69755/2995-2212.1377
Available at: https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/social_encounters/vol9/iss2/19
DOWNLOADS
Since September 21, 2025
Included in
African Languages and Societies Commons, African Studies Commons, Anthropology Commons, Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, International Relations Commons, Islamic Studies Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies Commons
Share
Recommended
Search
Advanced Search
ISSN: 2995-2212
Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement
Privacy Copyright